If you need a similar but plagiarism-free “peer review of annotated bibliography”, then feel free to contact us!
Guidelines for Peer Review of Annotated Bibliography
Once you have posted your rough draft, read and comment on 3 rough drafts posted in the discussion forum
Forum
Be sure to answer the peer feedback questions for the assignment clearly (not just a bulleted list). Post your reply as a response to the draft (hit the reply button to create a thread).
Remember that honest, constructive criticism helps the writer improve his or her paper to receive a better final grade. “This stinks” is not constructive criticism; be specific about what did not work well in the paper. (Equally unhelpful is a comment like “Nice job.”) Be honest, but be kind. Points will be deducted for incomplete, off-topic, and/or vague responses.
Peer Feedback Questions for the Annotated Bibliography
Answer all of the following questions in response to 3 peer drafts:
- Does the scope statement make clear what issue is being explored? Does it provide the necessary context and background information?
- Are there at least 5 sources that are alphabetized by the authors’ last names?
- Are all citations in correct MLA format, including all relevant publication information in the correct order?
- Does each annotation contain a concise description of each source and a summary of its contents?
- Does each annotation also contain an evaluation that explains why the source is useful and how it will be used in the argument essay?
- Are at least 2 sources from library databases?*
- Is the annotated bibliography well-written, using correct grammar, spelling, mechanics, etc?
If you need a similar but plagiarism-free “peer review of annotated bibliography”, then feel free to contact us!